PEACEapp: Launch of competition

carousel-5

PEACEapp is a global competition organized by the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations and the United Nations Development Program in collaboration with Build Up to promote digital games and gamified apps as venues for cultural dialogue and conflict management.

You can read more details of the competition here.

PEACEapp builds on the success of Create UNAOC – a competition for apps and games that promoted intercultural dialogue run by UNAOC and its partners in 2012.

Drawing on the unique cultural resources and experiences of developers, technologists and budding peacebuilders around the world, appPEACE invites individuals and teams — beginners and experts alike — to create new digital games or use existing digital games to foster dialogue that prevents violence.

The competition asks entrants to engage with questions that are central to building peace. How can we create new spaces for dialogue and shared action aimed at preventing violence? Is the key to provide opportunities for contact among individuals of different cultural or religious backgrounds? Can sharing stories also encourage mutual respect for cultural and religious values? Or is it about offering people tools to question and reframe their identity?

These questions are key to the work of the UNAOC, given its mandate to promote intercultural awareness. These questions are also closely linked to UNDP’s work on conflict prevention and peacebuilding.

PEACEapp is supported by a range of partners including Games for Change, the Institute for Economics and Peace, the MIT Center for Civic Media and the ICT for Peace Foundation.

Sanjana Hattotuwa, Special Advisor at the ICT4Peace Foundation, was on the panel of judges for Create UNAOC in 2012 and is again a judge for PEACEapp.

Daniel Stauffacher nominated Affiliate of The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University

Berkman
The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University invited ICT4Peace’s Daniel Stauffacher to  join its community as an affiliate in the 2014-2015 academic year.
“The incoming class of Berkman fellows, associates, and affiliates brings together an extraordinary group of thinkers, explorers, researchers, creators, bridge-builders, movers, and shakers from various disciplines and different parts of the world” saidUrsGasser, Berkman’s Executive Director and Professor of Practice at Harvard Law School. “Collectively, theyreflect the breadth and depth of a rapidly evolving Internet & society research agenda and form part of an expanding human and institutional network focused on such issues. We’re thrilled to work with such a diverse, talented, inspired, and committed group of colleagues and friends over the next academic year and beyond.”The diverse class of fellows will primarily work in Cambridge, MA alongside Berkman Directors and staff, and will serve as key instigators within the vibrant research community. Honoring the networked ethos central to Berkman, faculty associates and affiliates from institutions the world over will actively collaborate with the Berkman community through an array of channels. These relationships, as well as the countless fruitful engagements with alumni, partners, students, interns, and other colleagues, are fundamental to the Berkman Center’s work and identity, and serve to increase the capacity of the field and generate opportunities for lasting impact.

The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University is a research program founded to explore cyberspace, share in its study, and help pioneer its development. Founded in 1997, through a generous gift from Jack N. and Lillian R. Berkman, the Center is home to an ever-growing community of faculty, fellows, staff, and affiliates working on projects that span the broad range of intersections between cyberspace, technology, and society. More information can be found at http://cyber.law.harvard.edu.

Report of Crisis Information Management Advisory Group (CiMAG) 2014 Retreat

14495764074_2cff1a5b73_z

Led by the UN’s Office of Information and Communications Technology (OICT) and organised by the ICT4Peace Foundation, the 2014 Crisis Information Management Advisory Group (CiMAG) meeting was held on 23rd and 24th June in Glen Cove, New York. Representatives from OICT, OCHA, UNOCC, ICTD/DFS, UN Global Pulse, UNHCR, DPKO-DFS UNDP/BCPR, UNICEF/ITSS, UNICEF/Innovation Unit, WFP, EOSG, UNDP/BCPR (Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery) and DPA/EO/IMT participated along with, on the second day, representatives from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Amnesty International USA, The Resolve LRA Crisis Initiative, NYU and Storyful. UNHCHR and UNOSAT, who took part in the CiMAG retreat in 2013, sent regrets on their inability to participate on account of scheduling conflicts.

The agenda and list of participants are attached to the end of this report, which can be downloaded here, or read online here.

Launch of OCHA’s new humanitarian data platform: Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX)

The Foundation is pleased to note the launch of OCHA’s new humanitarian data platform, HDX. Shown a preview of it some weeks ago, the Foundation believes HDX – well beyond the humanitarian sector per se – is a long overdue yet absolutely critical foundation in systemic interoperability and information sharing, for the UN family and beyond.

OCHA’s HDX team has put together a short animation and interactive demonstration to introduce the platform. You can also follow HDX at @humdata and join the conversation using #HumanitarianData. Sign up to receive blog updates and register as a user of the platform. The most recent blog post provides a great overview of the data already included in HDX.

The ICT4Peace Foundation has championed the concept behind HDX from the time of the Haiti earthquake in 2010, when we recommended the use of APIs to connect both the UN family as well as the V&TC community around disaster response. The Foundation has, as part of the United Nations CiM process, also worked closely with OCHA for years to support the development of HXL, and importantly, raise awareness around possible use cases within and outside the UN. Information featured in HDX will also come from OCHA’s COD/FOD datasets, which the ICT4Peace Foundation helped support and develop.

Warmly congratulating OCHA on the public launch of HDX, we look forward to supporting the UN and the broader volunteer and technical community around technical challenges that are for us central to on-going efforts to protect lives and help communities at risk help themselves.

Confidence Building Measures and Norms for Cybersecurity and the Future of Internet Governance

PastedGraphic-1PastedGraphic-1

The Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS)  of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Singapore has invited Daniel Stauffacher of ICT4Peace to participate in an international workshop on “Confidence Building Measures and Norms for Cybersecurity and the Future of Internet Governance” on 3-4 July 2014 in Singapore.

In a panel discussion on efforts of International Organisations and NGOs in Developing CBMs, Daniel was asked to talk about the Role of Civil Society in Furthering CBMs. His intervention can be summarised as follows:

“The uncertainty in the international environment provoked by important geo-political shifts has added to the sense of complexity and mistrust surrounding discussions and debates on ‘cyberspace’ and the uses of information and communications technologies (ICTs) for attaining political, military or economic advantage. This reality has undermined confidence and trust between states, and between states and citizens.

Civil society participation (whether direct or indirect) in the development of national cybersecurity strategies or in regional and international CBM processes has been minimal, if anything, despite the fact that civil society organisations, as well as business and academia, are fundamental to resolving many of the core technical problems inherent in the ICT environment on the one hand, and many of the insecurities inherent in inter and intra-state relations on the other.

Despite these challenges, 2013 saw important breakthroughs in this regard. First, the UN GGE Report formally acknowledged the role of civil society in the area of building cooperation for a peaceful, secure, resilient, and open ICT environment; and the role of civil society (as well as that of the private sector) in supporting government efforts in developing and implementing CBMs and exchanging information.  And while the 2013 OSCE PC Decision on an Initial Set of CBMs to Reduce the Risks of Conflict Stemming from the Use of ICTs does not make any mention of a role for civil society, the norm of involving civil society in CBM processes is well ingrained in the OSCE’s working culture.

Daniel then discussed, what role  civil society (and business) play in furthering cybersecurity-related CBMs, particularly given these breakthroughs? A range of options were set in the presentation under three over-lapping rubrics i) Transparency and Accountability; ii) Participation; and iii) Deepening the Knowledge Base. The examples drew from a range of ICT4 Peace’s own experiences in the area of CBM development and implementation, and from other policy areas where civil society has made important CBM-related contributions.”

Daniel Stauffacher’s presentation can be found here.

Also on the panel were Ms. Zhang Jing from the Office of Cyber Affairs, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who spoke about the recent report of the UN Group of Governmental Experts on Cybersecurity and Ben Baseley-Walker of UNIDIR, Geneva, gave a  multilateral perspective on Cyber CBM’s.

How to innovate responsibly in a digital world?

Screen Shot 2014-06-27 at 8.10.21 AM

On 19 June 2012 ICT4Peace’s Daniel Stauffacher was invited by Oxford University’s Framework for Responsible Research & Innovation in ICT (FRRIICT) Project to participate in a panel discussion at the Science Museum in London on ‘How to innovate responsibly in a digital world?

The event was opened by a keynote address by Sir Nigel Shadbold (University of Southampton).

The panel discussion focussed inter alia on the question: ‘What are socially desirable and acceptable developments and uses of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs)?’

Chair:
Lizzie Coles Kemp (Royal Holloway, University of London)

Panel:
Daniel Stauffacher (ICT4Peace Foundation)
Derek MacAulay (Horizon Institute, University of Nottingham)
John Hand (EPSRC)
Anthony House (Google)
Judy Wajcman (London School of Economics)

Daniel Stauffacher introduced first the work of ICT4Peace since 2003, and mentioned some examples of the use of ICTs to promote peace and to prevent conflict. In particular for identifying conflict situations through early warning systems, supporting humanitarian action, including protection of civilians in armed conflicts, facilitating peacekeeping missions, and assisting post conflict peace-building and reconstruction.

He explained how Open Government Data can help Crisis Information Management and Aid Efficiency. He then discussed the need for data protection and the development and application of “do no harm principles” when using ICT’s in human rights protection work, protection of civilians in a humanitarian crisis. He introduced some examples of existing and emerging codes of conduct, such as regarding the usage of SMS in humanitarian disasters (by e.g. GSMA), managing sensitive protection information (by ICRC), or regarding the usage of civilian UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles).

Finally he presented the recent work of ICT4Peace in developing possible Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) to be applied in the Cyberspace among States and Training Courses for Diplomats, Government Officials, business and civil society representatives, with a view to support the ongoing international cyber security negotiations.

The event was organized by Marina Jirotka and Grace Eden from the University of Oxford (PI) and Bernd Stahl from De Montfort University (CI).

n=all: Presentation on big data for United Nations Department of Political Affairs (DPA)

14325245228_01d0877e0a_z

Sanjana Hattotuwa, Special Advisor at the ICT4Peace Foundation, gave a presentation on big data and data science at the invitation of the United Nations Department of Political Affairs (DPA) in New York on 25th June 2014.

The brown-bag session, attended by over 45 people from various departments and agencies at the UN in New York, was focussed on the following brief provided by DPA:

New web and mobile-based media and information dissemination platforms are constantly evolving and producing increasing amounts of content, much of which makes up what is often called “Big Data.” This unprecedented development has inevitably led to some vital questions. For example, can Big Data and the new media that both creates and disseminates it be used in crisis situations? Does Big Data disempower local communities as much as it democratizes data analysis? How can it help communities to mitigate, respond and recover from conflicts and disasters? What about its relationship to privacy and the potential misuse of information? The presentation will focus on these issues by seeking to explore ways in which information communication technologies (ICTs) can be used to aid DPA’s work, particularly in early warning and crisis mitigation and response.

Sanjana’s presentation focussed on how in Sri Lanka’s most recent communal violence, social media provided the first and best insights into the unfolding ground conditions, when official sources and mainstream media were silent. For the sake of the presentation, dividing big data between user generated content (UGC) and sensor data, Sanjana looked at how both are contributing to new ways of engaging with the world as well as adding to existing challenges around privacy, human rights and surveillance. Sanjana also looked at how big data is changing national and regional politics, and how elections in India recently as well as in other countries are now anchored to data driven decisions in electioneering and campaigning – the content around which had enduring implications for democracy and governance.

Eschewing the frequently held assumption that massive institutional investments in data science on an algorithmic or system intelligence level alone (e.g. by purchasing expensive platforms for big data collection, analysis and visualisation) was enough to leverage actionable intelligence from big data, Sanjana also flagged black swan events which remained extremely hard to identify and predict. Examples in this regard were social media content generation around the military coup in Thailand, the phenomenon of geo-remixing (of Pharell’s Happy music video) and the commemoration of Tiananmen Square violence in China 25 years ago, where if one didn’t know what to look out for and where to look, social resistance around official edicts go under the radar, which for DPA alone could mean that social agitation and nascent civil society resistance around the status quo could go undervalued and until much later, unnoticed.

Anchored to the Foundation’s core interest in Big Data, Sanjana ended by raising some rights based and ethical challenges around the generation and use of Big Data in polity and society, especially when so much of it is in the control of corporate entities.

Sanjana also flagged the ICT4Peace Foundation’s Big Data timeline and Flipboard magazine for those interested in the topic to follow.

Some photos from the presentation can be seen here.

High Level Meeting of the UN World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) reaffirms the potential of ICT4Peace

WSIS outcome

In preparation of the Review of the outcome of the UN World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) 2003 in Geneva and 2005 in Tunis by the UN General Assembly in fall 2014, the UN – in a remarkable multi-stakeholder process by Governments and Civil Society – reaffirmed last week in Geneva the potential of ICTs to promote peace and to prevent conflict.

In the Preamble of the Outcome Document of June 2014 the UN inter alia states:

“The information and communication technologies (ICTs) have also demonstrated their value as a facilitator and development enabler in reaching the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, major challenges still lay ahead for counteracting the wide disparities in development and enabling all groups and all countries to benefit from universal access to information and knowledge. Moreover reaping the benefit of ICTs use has yet not been shared in all countries proportionately. In particular we reaffirm paragraph 36 of the Tunis Commitment regarding the potential of ICTs to promote peace and to prevent conflict.”

The referenced Paragraph 36 of the WSIS Tunis Commitment in 2005 reads as follows:

“We (the Heads of States and Government) value the potential of ICTs to promote peace and to prevent conflict which, inter alia, negatively affects achieving development goals. ICTs can be used for identifying conflict situations through early warning systems preventing conflicts, promoting their peaceful resolution, supporting humanitarian action, including protection of civilians in armed conflicts, facilitating peacekeeping missions, and assisting post conflict peace-building and reconstruction.”

The new paragraph in the June 2014 Outcome document as well as paragraph 36 of the WSIS Tunis Commitment of 2005 was proposed for adoption by ICT4Peace’s Daniel Stauffacher.

The latter based on the findings of the ground-breaking report by ICT4Peace: The report “Information and Communication Technology for Peace: the role of ICT in preventing, responding to and recovering from conflict” (by D. Stauffacher, W. Drake, P. Currion and J. Steinberger) with a preface by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and a foreword by Swiss Foreign Affairs Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey. The report mapped out different possible uses of ICT in the areas of early warning and conflict prevention, mediation operations and support, protection of civilians and post-conflict reconstruction. Cross-cutting areas such as the use of the internet, the role of the media, technical development, networking and learning were also investigated. The report was published as part of the UN ICT Task Force Series.

International Workshop on Information and Cyber Security, Beijing, 5 – 6 June 2014

ICT4Peace’s Daniel Stauffacher was invited by the Department of Arms Control and Disarmament, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, P.R. China to  chair a panel at the Senior-level International Workshop on Information and Cyber Security, co-organized between China and the UN Regional Centre for Peace and Disarmament  in Asia and the Pacific, and the and UN Office for Disarmament Affairs, New York Beijing  5 – 6 June 2014.

The following countries participated in the workshop: Australia, Brazil, Brunei, Cambodia, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uzbekistan.

In an open and frank manner, the workshop discussions built on the ongoing work of the UN Group of Governmental Experts on Cyber Security 1) in New York, and included a lively debate of burning issues, such as  establishing norms of responsible state behavior in the cyberspace (e.g. in view of possible attacks on critical infrastructure, violation of data protection rights, freedom of information) and the urgent need for Confidence Building Measures (CBM) for the Cyberspace among states. In this context the ongoing regional activities, e.g. at OSCE and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), but also in Africa and Latin America were discussed.

In addition, capacity-building measures, that are needed to enable all regions of the world, and especially less developed countries to build capacities for better cyber security and participate in the emerging global negotiations were called for. In this regard the newly launched ICT4Peace Training Programme for government officials, private sector and civil society representatives on “International Cybersecurity Negotiations“ was announced.

Daniel Stauffacher’s panel focussed on Building Regional Dialogue, Cooperation and Capacity and covered inter alia  the following topics: The cyberspace has witnessed energetic efforts from regional exchanges  and  cooperation. What progress has been made at the regional level? Which areas are calling for our additional attention? What is the relationship between regional efforts and international processes  ? How to coordinate them ?

The panelists were:

Ms. Shariffa Rashidah SYED OTHMAN, Principal Assistant Secretary, Cyber and Space Security Division, National Security Council, Prime Minister’s Department of Malaysia

Ms. Jooyeon Ellen KANG, Deputy Director of International  Security Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea

Mr. Du Yuejin, Director, National Institute of Network and Information Security, China

Ambassador Jan Biggs, Assistant Secretary, International Security Division, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia

Ms. Olivia Preston, Assistant Director, International Relations Office for Cyber Security and Information Assurance, Cabinet Office, UK.

1) Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security (A/68/98*).

Some photos from the event can be seen below, or here.

For additional information regarding the work of the  ICT4Peace Foundation in the field of Rights and Security in the Cyberspace please refer to the following recent publications:

2013
2014